Macarthur Bicycle Users Group / Macarthur Bushwalkers

Japanese Whaling in Australian Antarctic Waters

Things you should know about Japanese whaling - the pros and cons

Australia is being pressured by the United States - ABC News

US tries to influence Australia - An anti-whaling group says Australia is being pressured by the United States to drop its demand for Japan to end so-called scientific whaling.

Research on Japanese whaling in Australian Antarctic waters
  1. Penthrite Grenade Harpoon
    If a Penthrite explosion within a whale's body was a guarantee of instantaneous death or unconsciousness, as is often claimed by the whaling industry, then why are the average times to death not less than 10 seconds? Why is the proportion of whales killed instantaneously never significantly greater than about half? Why does it continue to be necessary for the Norwegian Minke whaling industry to employ a secondary killing method? It is because the Penthrite grenade harpoon fails to inflict a guaranteed fatality. Few though they are, the killing data so far released by the Government of Norway prove that the Penthrite grenade harpoon fails to kill instantaneously in the majority of cases, just like the cold harpoon. During Norwegian commercial Minke whaling between 1984 and 1986, 55.2 per cent of the whales were not killed instantaneously; and during the 1994 Norwegian hunt the proportion - the best achieved so far - was 44 per cent.
    The harpooned whale which is not killed instantly suffers from the pain inflicted by the penetration of the harpoon body, expanding claws, forerunner (harpoon line) and shrapnel fragments; and the disruption of tissues caused by the rapid expansion of gases during explosion.

    However, consideration is rarely given to the effect on a still conscious and struggling whale when it is winched in: the strain on the line increases the stress on, and damage to, the wound area, which must further increase the pain experienced by the whale.

    A significant proportion of Penthrite grenade harpoon strikes kill very slowly. In this respect, the Penthrite grenade harpoon is as inhumane as any other harpoon. A great many potentially long and lingering deaths are only curtailed by use of a secondary killing method; without which, the times to death for many whales would extend into many tens of minutes or several hours
    .

    The difficulties of accurately determining time of death or unconsciousness. It is likely that there are cases when harpooned whales are declared dead or unconscious when in fact they are paralysed and still fully conscious.
    by Breach Marine Protection UK

  2. Whale burger on menu at Japanese fast food chain 13:00 AEST Thu Jun 23 2005
    Reuters
    TOKYO - With Japan under fire for plans to expand its whaling programme, a fast food chain is offering a new product aimed at using up stocks from past hunts -- whale burger.
    The 380 yen ($A4.50) slice of fried Minke whale in a bun went on sale on Thursday at Lucky Pierrot, a restaurant chain in the port city of Hakodate on Japan's northernmost island of Hokkaido.
    "The taste and texture are somewhere between beef and fish," said chain manager Miku Oh. "People in Hakodate have a long history of eating whale, so customers are looking forward to trying it."
    Japan's plan to expand its scientific whale hunt to an annual catch of 900 Minke whales were dealt a blow on Wednesday when the International Whaling Commission passed a resolution at a meeting in South Korea urging it to instead cut back on the catch.
    "We are not going out to catch whales because we want to eat them, we are just using up meat from whales that have been killed for experiments," Oh said.

  3. Tokyo, Japan — If you wanted a census of wild birds, would you get a slingshot and kill them to count them? This is practically what the Government of Japan is proposing, yet again. Wire reports reveal that a secret proposal from Japan's Fisheries Agency sets a "scientific" quota of double the current take of Minke whales. They also want to add endangered humpback and fin whales. It's time for killing in the name of science to stop. - Greenpeace - From Japan with love: a slap in the face. Japan's government disguise whaling as "science"

  4. To kill them, whalers launch grenade-tipped spears that pierce the whales' bodies, then detonate internally. But the first blast often doesn't kill the poor whale, and whale hunters have to finish the job -- minutes later -- with another grenade or by firing rifles.

    from Greenpeace
    copyright Greenpeace

  5. Justice James Allsop said his decision was based on a Federal Government submission which warned of diplomatic repercussions if the case was allowed to be heard.

    The decision means a resumption of whaling - including endangered Humpback whales - is free to go ahead in a matter of weeks, and in Australian waters.

    The Humane Society International (HSI) applied to the court last year to have a case heard which would seek to prosecute Japanese whaling company Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha for whaling in Australian waters near Antarctica. However, the judge agreed with a submission lodged by Attorney-General Philip Ruddock against the case proceeding.

    Mr Ruddock said the case would contravene international law because Japan did not recognise Australia's sovereign claims.

    The Federal Government argued it would prefer a diplomatic solution. The decision confirms the Government has no power or no will to enforce its environmental laws in Australian-claimed waters off Antarctica.

  6. The company kills around 440 Minke whales inside Australia's Antarctic Territory each year and has slaughtered whales within the sanctuary every summer since 1987.

    Japan wants to broaden its whale kill to include humpback whales, which travel up the Australian coast to breed. HSI was seeking permission from the Federal Court to take legal action against the company to have its whale hunting declared illegal.

    Justice Allsop dismissed the application, claiming legal action against the company could jeopardise Australia's national interests.

    "The Australian Government has the view that the attempt to enforce the EPBC Act [to stop the killing of whales] may upset the diplomatic status quo ... and may be contrary to Australia's long-term national interests," he said.

    "It is sufficient for me to say that the submissions of the Attorney-General appear to have great force." Mr Ruddock said in his submission that the Government had no right to enforce its laws on Japan because Japan did not recognise Australia's claim of territorial sovereignty over the Australian Antarctic Territory.

  7. Humpbacks are preyed upon by humans and killer whales. These whales have been hunted to near extinction, and only about 2,500 exist today.

  8. Fisher says that certain stocks of whales are endangered by the hunting. For example, there are only 900 individuals left in the "J stock" of Minke whales, which live in the North Pacific region. These are genetically separate from the more common "O stock".

    However, at certain times of the year, the J stock migrate and mix with the O stock where they are then subject to hunting, as the IWC sets scientific quotas by geographical area only.

    Academic researchers are also unconvinced by Japan's use of science as a justification for the hunt. Hal Whitehead, at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, told New Scientist print edition in an interview this week: "I am a scientist, and I value my profession. 'Scientific whaling' is like the prostitution of the profession: using the name of science for a totally bogus purpose." (NewScientist.com)

  9. Iceland in the period 1950 - 1970 changed their territorial water limits several times during the Icelandic Cod Wars. Eventually they reached the current distance of 200 miles, to do so they changed their laws and used their patrol boats to thwart the Royal Navy and the British fishing fleet. Eventually they succeeded through the European courts and saved the Icelandic Cod breeding grounds. I guess it is too much to ask our typically weak Australian Government to defend its territorial waters, they are too concerned with the dollar and offending our Japanese neighbours, pity the Japanese don't reciprocate those concerns.

  10. The fact is whale meat can be purchased in Japanese shops as a special treat for human consumption. If the Japanese now wish to catch humpbacks, it is more likely they are satisfy the palate rather than any scientific purpose. The IWC cannot be trusted to act in the whale’s best interests.(Solomon Star)

  11. Developed nations that offer large sums to island nations for the right to fish in their waters, usually have already decimated the fish stocks in their own waters to the point where fishing there is no longer commercially viable. For many Pacific nations like Kiribati, the income received from the sale of fishing licenses to wealthier countries is irresistible. However, accepting it is usually a grave error as the real wealth (tied up in the catch and not the license fees) is exported out of the host country and in the end benefits only an elite handful of people. This pattern has occurred in so many small nations and has been so clearly disastrous to their economies and fish stocks, that we fear greatly for the future of the Kiribati.

    At a recent Fisheries meeting in Japan (JARPN II-in August and September 2000) the Japanese Fisheries Agency gave delegates from all nations written material and pictures depicting whales as serious food competitors of squid and blue-fin tuna. The information was compiled by the Fisheries Agency of the Government of Japan, and included photographs of the stomach contents of a dead sperm whale, containing a large quantity of squid.(Voyage of the Odyssey - The Politics of Whales)

  12. The IFAW Economic Report : From Whalers to Whale Watchers shows that Australians are falling in love with whales it found that close to two million people went whale watching in 2003. The IFAW report found the whale watching industry had contributed more than $340 million to the economy in 2003. In the 25 years since the ban on whaling, Australians have embraced whale watching, recognising that whales are worth more alive than dead.

    The whale migration map which allows users to find out where in Australian and pacific waters the whales are, where they go. Whales are currently protected in Australian waters but once they leave the safety of our coastal areas they still face dangers. When whales travel south on their annual migration to Antarctica they face the prospect of Japan’s annual whale hunt in the Southern Ocean. Japan plans to expand this hunt by attempting to revoke the current Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. (IFAW - Whale Watching in Australia)

  13. "Killing whales in Australian waters is an offense. We hope HSI’s case in the Federal Court will embarrass the whaling company and the Japanese government, and push the Australian government into prosecuting the whaling themselves," said HSI’s Wildlife and Habitat Program Manager Nicola Beynon.

    The Australian Whale Sanctuary is in the Commonwealth marine area, beyond the coastal waters of each state and territory. It includes all of Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone extending to 200 nautical miles (350 kilometers) from the coast, and includes the waters around the Australian Antarctic Territory and Australia's external territories, such as Christmas, Heard and Macdonald islands. (Note item 6 - Icelandic Cod War)

    Under the law, there are penalties of up to $110,000 and/or up to two years' imprisonment for illegally killing, injuring, taking, trading, keeping, moving, interfering with or treating a cetacean in the Australian Whale Sanctuary.

    The International Whaling Commission imposed a moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986. "Since 1987, in defiance of the moratorium, Japan has dressed up its whale hunts as research. Citing a loophole under the international convention, which allows for scientific whaling, Japan claims the hunts are legal and kills approximately 440 Minke whales every year in Antarctic waters," the HSI says.

    In the last four years, HSI estimates nearly a quarter of all the whales slaughtered in Japan’s Antarctic research program have been killed in the Australian Whale Sanctuary. Ocean Conserve

  14. IT IS rare for a cookery class to court political controversy, but in Tokyo yesterday, the Women's Forum for Fish was doing just that, teaching whale meat recipes as an international row over whale hunting brewed.

    About 50 mostly middle-aged Japanese were learning to prepare whale meat in a class sponsored by the pro-whaling forum. As they fried and boiled thick cuts of the chewy flesh, talk revolved around the delicacy, and foreign opposition to it.

    "There isn't a part of the whale that we Japanese don't use. We even make soup out of its blood," said Yuriko Shiraishi, the forum's head. "Foreigners need to understand that this is part of our culture." (News.Scotsman.com)

  15. The population of sea lions, seals and otters in the north Pacific Ocean has declined so catastrophically in recent years that scientists fear for their continued survival, and the reasons why remain open to fierce debate. Now, a team of scientists has come up with a creative hypothesis that blames it all on human activities following World War II.

    Extensive whaling removed more than half a million great whales from the north Pacific after the war, forcing a subtle change in the dietary habits of the true lord of the ocean, the Killer Whale, according to this new theory. With fewer baleen and sperm whales to dine on, pods of Killer Whales that used to take out an occasional great whale gradually turned to other marine animals, setting off an ecological domino effect that has extended to the present. (ABC News - How whale hunting changed the ocean)

  16. Whale hunting takes place in at least the following countries today, some of which are members of the IWC while others are not: Canada, the Commonwealth of Dominica, the Faroes, Greenland, Grenada, Indonesia, Japan, Norway, the Philippines, Russia, St. Lucia, St .Vincent and the Grenadines, and the USA.

    The so-called "IWC whales" that are hunted are Bottlenose, Bowhead, Bryde's, Gray, Fin, Humpback, Minke and Sperm whales. The "non-IWC whales" hunted are Beluga, Narwhal, Baird's Beaked, Pilot, Pygmy Killer and various dolphins and porpoises.(High North Alliance - pro-whaling lobby)

  17. Humpback whales throughout much of the South Pacific have shown little sign of recovery to their former abundance, despite claims to the contrary by some Japanese scientists. Conservation Minister Chris Carter has already indicated that New Zealand will fight the proposal on several counts and other governments are also expected to challenge the proposal.

    “Nearly 200,000 humpback whales and more than 700,000 fin whales were killed in the Southern Hemisphere during the 20th century reducing both populations to near extinction. Now, it seems Japan plans to resume hunting of both species in defiance of the 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling and the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary,” says Dr Baker.(Scoop Independent News - Whales at risk again from Japanese hunting)

  18. An Australian Associated Press report is saying that the AAT Research ship "Aurora Australis" has found a catcher from the 5 vessel Japanese whaling fleet inside the AAT Economic zone claimed by Australia. The vessel was spotted 38 nautical miles inside the AAT zone by Prydz Bay. The "Aurora Australis" has ordered the Japanese vessel to leave the zone immediately. The Japanese reaction is not known at this stage.(70South - Australia orders Japanese whalers out)

Koizumi unmoved by whale reproach

By Deborah Cameron Herald Correspondent in Tokyo and Cynthia Banham
May 25, 2005

Outrage over Japan's plan to slaughter humpbacks

Japan has brushed off an attempt by the Prime Minister to use the clout of his office to force a backdown over whaling.

A letter to Japan's prime minister, Mr Junichiro Koizumi, from Mr Howard saying that whales were a "great delight" for tourists and that there was no basis for killing whales as part of a scientific program, has failed to win diplomatic attention in Tokyo.

Mr Koizumi's office confirmed that it had arrived but deflected further inquiries to the Department of Foreign Affairs which, in turn, brushed it off.

Mr Howard said yesterday that pursuing a diplomatic path in trying to convince Japan to drop its controversial plans to increase its whaling program was the "sensible" thing to do because Japan was a "close friend of Australia".

Australia is opposed to whaling and is campaigning against Japan's proposal that it take more whales and add more species to its scientific quota.

"There is clear evidence of the extent of public interest in the continued health and welfare of whales and considerable public concern could be expected, not only in Australia, but across the globe, were whaling to increase," Mr Howard's letter said. Japan's public justification for whaling is that scientific research is necessary to understand the animal's physiology and breeding habits as well as ocean ecology.
The meat, a by-product of the scientific program, should not go to waste, according to Japan. So once the whale is slaughtered, the meat and blubber is sold at the country's fish markets.

There is virtually no controversy about whaling in Japan, where green groups keep a low profile.

Mr Howard also defended his Government's refusal to initiate legal action against Japan in the International Court of Justice - which Labor is pushing for - saying it was not productive for Australia to "adopt an arm's length belligerence towards Japan".
The Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer, rejected Labor's calls to use Australia's Pacific aid budget to push nations like the Solomon Islands to support Canberra's position.

But Labor accused the Government of not doing enough to stop Japan from accelerating its commercial whaling program.

Its foreign affairs spokesman, Kevin Rudd, said the Government's actions to date had failed to stop Japan misusing its "so-called scientific research exemption to the ban on commercial whaling".

"It's time for Mr Howard to show some courage, stand up to Japan and prepare a case to take to the International Court of Justice" he said.

Mr Howard did not rule out taking legal action, but he said Australia was "far more likely to get a result if we pursue the matter in a diplomatic fashion".

advocacy | advocacy2 | advocacy3 | bushfire | bushwalk rules | club info | day walk | first walk | home page | links | buy a bike | guidelines
checklist | leaders tips | overnight | touring bikes | photograph galleries | responsible bushwalking | safety | sitemap | tips
news | walk grades | whaling
Previous page
Absolutely Stylish Website Design